As time allows, I continue to read through my ancient volume of the letters between Ralph Waldo Emerson and Thomas Carlyle, a letter or two at a time in the evening, every few days. I came across this tidbit from Emerson.
Every writer is a skater, who must go partly where he would and partly, where the skates carry him; or a sailor, who can only land where sails can be safely blown. The variations to be allowed for in the surveyor's compass are nothing like so large as those that must be allowed for in every book.
Ralph Waldo Emerson to Thomas Carlyle, from Concord 17 May 1858
These two friends had been writing for twenty-five years. Emerson had made two visits to Carlyle in England during that time, but Carlyle never ventured across the seas to America. In all his letters, Carlyle always complained about the books he was writing. Each one was an arduous task he would love to be rid of (I'll cover that specifically in a future post); each was likely to cause his death; each resulting work was terrible. At present Carlyle was about done with his longest work, a biography of Frederick the Great, and he complained about it in every letter to Emerson (these letters now being a year apart, with Emerson the reluctant to write).
I think these words of Emerson might have partly been in answer to some of Carlyle's complaints. The writer begins a piece, Emerson says, but the piece winds up only partly where the writer expected it to go. Just as an ice skater sets his direction, but is somewhat at the mercy of skates and ice (depending, of course, on the skill of the skater). The exact direction and stopping point is unknown. The writer chooses the subject of the book; does the outline; maybe even writes a synopsis of the chapters; but the book takes on a life of its own as the writer writes.
Or, as Emerson says, "the writer is...a sailor, who can only land where sails can be safely blown." Now of course, a skilled sailor, with a good ship or boat, properly rigged and outfitted, can reduce the variability of the landing spot. I remember my brief sailing days, and the frustration at trying to get my 10 foot trimaran to do what I wanted it to do on Point Jude Pond. A skilled sailor learns how to use the variable direction and strength of the wind to his best advantage, yet can never quite tell exactly what spot of water he will be on at every given time, nor exactly where he will land.
So with the writer. The Olympian skater has much less variability in where the skates take him than do I when I get on the ice--which I haven't in at least twenty-eight years. The writer must acquire skills and experience to allow the things he writes to be more under his control. As the vessel carrying the sailor must be properly built and maintained, the writer does not get where he wants to be except with similar preparation and outfitting. Still, just as the best skaters sometimes end up not exactly where they thought they would be, as the best sailors still have variable conditions to account for, so the writer's work is never quite as imagined from the start.
It's something for me to think about as I progress on this journey.
Next blog post: Carlyle's reply.
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Dave, what an apt quote by Emerson; I think he's quite right (at least about every writer being a skater). In one sense a writer has to follow where the piece takes him; yet, in another, the work is not a beauty to behold if the writer has not given the time to perfecting the individual skills that make up the work as a whole. A skater will spend hours laboriously doing the boring skill work, so that when it comes time to perform a meticulously planned program, he'll do it as flawlessly as possible (though still having to improvise for unforseen 'plot changes' along the way!) But the euphoria at the end makes it all worthwhile. ;)
Pat:
Thanks for coming by and reading. Either today (6/18) or tomorrow I'll be posting about Carlyle's reply.
Post a Comment